Lindsay Lohan sues E*Trade over Super Bowl spot
When you hear the name "Lindsay," who (or what) comes into your mind?
I know that many who live in New York might immediately think of a former mayor. Some in the California might think of the Lindsay Wildlife Museum in Walnut Creek. It seems, though, that sometime actress Lindsay Lohan believes that she is Lindsay and Lindsay is she.
Lohan appears to have taken offense at one of the babies in an E*Trade TV spot that made its debut during this year's Super Bowl. Specifically, she is offended by the alleged milkaholic who happens to be called Lindsay.
According to the New York Post, Lohan is suing E*Trade because she believes the Lindsay in the ad, who is not only a milkaholic but also a manboy-stealer, is a thinly disguised mocking of her own persona. Lohan's obvious heartfelt anguish is, apparently, worth $100 million. At least to her.
The Post kindly quotes Stephanie Ovadia, Lohan's lawyer. Ovadia believes her client has single-name recognition. You know, like Madonna, Oprah, and Madoff. She said: "They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message."
The lawsuit is reportedly claiming a breach of civil rights, as well as use of "name and characterization" without payment or permission. "Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan," Ovadia told the Post.
I must admit that I have not been talking about it. I don't know anyone who has been talking about it. But I do have a little news for Ovadia to talk about. The 2008 list of 100 most popular baby girl names doesn't include Susan. Or Lindsay. It doesn't even have Stephanie. The 2009 list of Top 10 baby girl names has none of them either. Ella and Grace are the top two.
And when I look at the spot, I fail to see any resemblance to Lohan. Yes, it's a baby. But it's a baby with short hair and no freckles, and Lohan is clearly known for her long locks and her facial dots.
A spokesperson for the Grey Group, the rascal fiends who made this ad, offered a rather prosaic explanation for the Lindsay character. The agency, he told the Post, "just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team."
You see, that's what happens in ad agencies. They are terribly self-referential places. You remember that Sprint ad, for example, where the girl character is called Tracy Palmer? That's the name of the director of consumer advertising at, no, really, Sprint.
I wonder just how much of a case Lohan has here. I also wonder why she doesn't seem to have made many movies lately. She was extremely good in "Mean Girls." Perhaps she should drink a little more milk. I hear it's good for you.
Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. 






I just thought the ad was funny and cleverly done too.
wait ... why i am wasting my time posting here. i am out of here. have better things to do.
I did a search on IMDb for "Lindsay" and she wasn't in the top 5 exact match namesthey listed, funny thng is when I searched "Susan" there are 17 exact match names.
I think the Lohan spinsters should be directing their lawsuits else where.
Oh, and I love the ad, especially the ending.
Lindsay is was extremely popular and is still comes in at #380 in the US for girl's names. Regardless of exactly how popular it is, there's no question there are a lot of people names Lindsay.
So, tell her lawyer it was a name like Susan. Apparently Susan is even less popular than Lindsay:
http://www.babynamewizard.com/namipedia/girl/susan
Coming in at #712.
Now that's funny.
- by PixP March 9, 2010 10:53 PM PST
- lol. I don't even know who this person is let alone think it was her in the ad.
- Like this Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
- by stepyourgameup March 10, 2010 9:48 AM PST
- You don't know who Lindsay Lohan is??? Have you been in a coma for 10 years?
- Like this
Showing 1 of 2 pages (45 Comments)