• On CBSSports.com: Watch March Madness® Games Free Online
This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.
March 9, 2010 7:21 PM PST

Lindsay Lohan sues E*Trade over Super Bowl spot

by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 45 comments

When you hear the name "Lindsay," who (or what) comes into your mind?

I know that many who live in New York might immediately think of a former mayor. Some in the California might think of the Lindsay Wildlife Museum in Walnut Creek. It seems, though, that sometime actress Lindsay Lohan believes that she is Lindsay and Lindsay is she.

Lohan appears to have taken offense at one of the babies in an E*Trade TV spot that made its debut during this year's Super Bowl. Specifically, she is offended by the alleged milkaholic who happens to be called Lindsay.

According to the New York Post, Lohan is suing E*Trade because she believes the Lindsay in the ad, who is not only a milkaholic but also a manboy-stealer, is a thinly disguised mocking of her own persona. Lohan's obvious heartfelt anguish is, apparently, worth $100 million. At least to her.

The Post kindly quotes Stephanie Ovadia, Lohan's lawyer. Ovadia believes her client has single-name recognition. You know, like Madonna, Oprah, and Madoff. She said: "They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message."

The lawsuit is reportedly claiming a breach of civil rights, as well as use of "name and characterization" without payment or permission. "Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan," Ovadia told the Post.

I must admit that I have not been talking about it. I don't know anyone who has been talking about it. But I do have a little news for Ovadia to talk about. The 2008 list of 100 most popular baby girl names doesn't include Susan. Or Lindsay. It doesn't even have Stephanie. The 2009 list of Top 10 baby girl names has none of them either. Ella and Grace are the top two.

And when I look at the spot, I fail to see any resemblance to Lohan. Yes, it's a baby. But it's a baby with short hair and no freckles, and Lohan is clearly known for her long locks and her facial dots.

A spokesperson for the Grey Group, the rascal fiends who made this ad, offered a rather prosaic explanation for the Lindsay character. The agency, he told the Post, "just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team."

You see, that's what happens in ad agencies. They are terribly self-referential places. You remember that Sprint ad, for example, where the girl character is called Tracy Palmer? That's the name of the director of consumer advertising at, no, really, Sprint.

I wonder just how much of a case Lohan has here. I also wonder why she doesn't seem to have made many movies lately. She was extremely good in "Mean Girls." Perhaps she should drink a little more milk. I hear it's good for you.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
Teen gets carpal tunnel from texting, wants iPhone
iPad ad goes viral
Cloak of invisibility becomes more foreseeable
Burger King's secret cameras stun customers
Facebook chatter betrays alleged Mafia hitman
South Park creates new EA Tiger Woods game
Ingenious proof that publishing may have a future
Ex-employee accused of remotely disabling 100 cars
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (45 Comments)
by Tech Diva XXX March 9, 2010 7:39 PM PST
I never thought of Lohan when I saw that ad. She NEVER crossed my mind.

I just thought the ad was funny and cleverly done too.
Reply to this comment 14 people like this comment
by gkeramidas March 9, 2010 7:42 PM PST
she has no case and no talent.
Reply to this comment 13 people like this comment
by monkeyfun14 March 9, 2010 7:43 PM PST
100 million? Thats alot of drugs sex and clubbing.
Reply to this comment 18 people like this comment
by monkeyfun14 March 9, 2010 7:44 PM PST
Oh lets not forget alcohol =]
11 people like this comment
by disco-legend-zeke March 12, 2010 6:56 AM PST
Lindsay who?
by cbscowards March 9, 2010 7:44 PM PST
She needs the money to finance her next binge and rehab cycle
Reply to this comment 11 people like this comment
by davoxdipueblo March 9, 2010 8:19 PM PST
is this a joke ? hoh no wait its not but i am laughing anyway. hey linsay do you think you are the only alcoholic, sex starved, drug, lesbian addict there is ? hah no here is your reality check there are hundreds like you out there. if not ask brittney or go to paris.
wait ... why i am wasting my time posting here. i am out of here. have better things to do.
Reply to this comment 6 people like this comment
by dougzv March 9, 2010 8:21 PM PST
Lindsay who?
Reply to this comment 16 people like this comment
by jaybee75 March 9, 2010 8:51 PM PST
I guess Lindsay isn't getting enough media attention so her "team" pulled this stunt.

I did a search on IMDb for "Lindsay" and she wasn't in the top 5 exact match namesthey listed, funny thng is when I searched "Susan" there are 17 exact match names.

I think the Lohan spinsters should be directing their lawsuits else where.

Oh, and I love the ad, especially the ending.
Reply to this comment 6 people like this comment
by cpopken March 9, 2010 8:52 PM PST
What an ego.
Reply to this comment 3 people like this comment
by whocares47 March 9, 2010 8:59 PM PST
What a looooooossssssseeeeeerrrr!! No one cares or ever thought about lindsey"washed up"lohan when making this commercial. you are dilusional!!!Go smoke some crack!
Reply to this comment 4 people like this comment
by ColonelSharp March 9, 2010 8:59 PM PST
Are you for real Ms. Lohan? No one in their right minds would ever associate the baby in the funny TV commercial with you...please, the world doesn't revolve around you.
Reply to this comment 5 people like this comment
by dpix March 9, 2010 9:07 PM PST
Oh please, I thought the ad was great & never once thought of Lohan. Guess she is afraid her popularity is dwindling & she needs some more attention.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by ddhboy March 9, 2010 9:10 PM PST
Fun Fact, the name Lindsey is the 162nd most popular name in the United States.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by MickBurke March 9, 2010 9:40 PM PST
I think Lindsey Buckingham really has a case! Not only did they call him a drunk and a ****, they even said he was a girl!?!? That's worth $200,000,000.00 any day of the week!
Reply to this comment 6 people like this comment
by Perry_Clease March 10, 2010 4:41 AM PST
Or the politician Lindsey Graham
by mtnbkr1169 March 9, 2010 9:54 PM PST
The only thing that crossed my mind about this ad was how funny it was. If Lindsey Lohan believes that the commercial is about her, well then maybe that speaks volumes about her own self esteem... she needs help... badly...
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by BlutoNYC March 9, 2010 9:57 PM PST
Lohan would have made $300 million by now if she took her acting career more seriously. This is probably her last shot at making any decent money unless some stupid reality show picks her up.
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by 1st March 9, 2010 10:02 PM PST
Hmm, interesting. "Specifically, she is offended by the alleged milkaholic who happens to be called Lindsay" . It might be e-Trade's fault. If they use "workaholic" instead, I am sure it is not going to be associated with THE Lindsay. Mistaken identity.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by Drummer16161616 March 9, 2010 10:35 PM PST
Publicity stunt cuz no one cares about her...sad
Reply to this comment 3 people like this comment
by paulej March 9, 2010 10:35 PM PST
According to these folks: http://www.babynamewizard.com/namipedia/girl/lindsay

Lindsay is was extremely popular and is still comes in at #380 in the US for girl's names. Regardless of exactly how popular it is, there's no question there are a lot of people names Lindsay.

So, tell her lawyer it was a name like Susan. Apparently Susan is even less popular than Lindsay:
http://www.babynamewizard.com/namipedia/girl/susan

Coming in at #712.

Now that's funny.
Reply to this comment
by protagonistic March 9, 2010 10:43 PM PST
Ms Lohan will be shocked to learn I never even thought of her any of the times I saw this ad. I must make a note to myself to make sure I do not watch any of her movies. An idiot like her doesn't deserve to get any of my money.
Reply to this comment
by PixP March 9, 2010 10:53 PM PST
lol. I don't even know who this person is let alone think it was her in the ad.
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by stepyourgameup March 10, 2010 9:48 AM PST
You don't know who Lindsay Lohan is??? Have you been in a coma for 10 years?
Showing 1 of 2 pages (45 Comments)
advertisement
See full River page
advertisement

Viacom, Google air dirty laundry in court docs

Copyright confrontation gets fierce. Viacom says YouTube founders always intended to build video version of Napster and looked for ways to "to avoid the copyright bastards."
• Google's statement on YouTube-Viacom

Google's fast pipe to Asia almost ready

An undersea cable built by a group including Google and telecom companies is set to start carrying traffic at any point, with Google to get as much as 20 percent of the capacity.

advertisement

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Subscribe to this feed Subscribe via RSS

Click this link to view as XML.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right