• On CBSSports.com: Watch March Madness® Games Free Online
This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.
November 20, 2009 1:05 PM PST

Electric-car maker Tesla preparing IPO

by Reuters
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 13 comments
Reuters

U.S. electric-car maker Tesla Motors plans to go public soon, two sources familiar with the matter said, amid growing interest in green technology and battery-powered vehicles.

An IPO filing from the 6-year-old start-up, best known for its $109,000 all-electric Roadster, is expected any day, said one of the sources. The person did not give a specific time frame, although IPOs typically take several months.

Tesla spokesman Ricardo Reyes declined to comment on what he called "rumor or speculation."

Tesla Model S

Tesla Model S(Credit: Caroline McCarthy/CNET)

Tesla would mark the first public offering from a U.S. automaker since Henry Ford's Ford Motor debuted its shares in 1956. The IPO represents a landmark in the resurgence of electric-car technology that most carmakers had dismissed as impractical until recently.

The company's chairman Elon Musk said early last year that an IPO was a possibility in either late 2008 or 2009.

But the financial market turmoil following the collapse of Lehman Bros. in the latter half of 2008 virtually shut down the IPO market. The appetite for IPOs has picked up since mid-September this year with a robust pace of new filings.

Tesla's IPO would follow the successful debut of lithium ion battery maker A123 Systems, whose shares rallied 50 percent on their first day of trading on September 25.

Analysts have said that the success of A123, the first green-technology IPO this year, would encourage more venture capital-backed green companies to go public.

Tesla will compete with established automakers like Ford, General Motors, and Nissan Motor, all of which are racing to launch electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles. Tesla, by contrast, is a small player with a high-end market and limited production.

A combination of factors has driven the recent interest in developing electric, or partially electric vehicles, including the Obama administration's push to have 1 million rechargeable vehicles on U.S. roads by 2015 and low-cost Department of Energy loans for manufacturers.

Venture funds back green cars
The carmaker is developing a second, lower-cost model, an electric sedan known as the Model S, which will have a base price of $49,900.

Tesla said in September it delivered 700 Roadsters since February 2008. The Roadster, which is built on a Lotus frame, can go from 0 to 60 miles an hour in less than four seconds, making it faster than a Porsche 911 or a Ferrari Spider.

The electric-car start-up was offered $465 million in low-cost loans by the U.S. Department of Energy to help build the new Model S. Tesla said it will build the new car in California.

Tesla's investors include Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

Other investors include Daimler; Abu Dhabi-based Aabar Investments, which owns a stake in Daimler; and venture capital funds Valor Equity Partners, Technology Partners, The Westly Group, and Compass Venture Partners.

Tesla said it had achieved overall corporate profitability in July with about $1 million of earnings on revenue of $20 million.

But like established automakers, survival in the hyper-competitive U.S. automotive market has not been easy for Tesla. The company had to face cost overruns and production delays for the Roadster.

Story Copyright (c) 2010 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

Additional stories from Reuters

  1. Senate climate bill to give free permits: sources
  2. States sue EPA to stop greenhouse gas rules
  3. Indonesia to review forest carbon laws: official
  4. Waste industry hunts energy rewards, risks abound
Recent posts from Green Tech
Survey: Consumers intrigued by electric cars
U.S. wind power growing fast but still lags
Toshiba says good-bye to incandescent era
Bright spot for one California college: A solar farm
GE places solar bets on thin-film cells
If you modernize the grid, will consumers care?
AT&T to sell eco-friendly phone charger
DOE grants $1 million for ocean energy research
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by TCrimson05 November 20, 2009 4:11 PM PST
Interesting.
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania November 20, 2009 7:06 PM PST
Go Tesla.

You GOTTA use this influx of cash to get the mass production machine greased, oiled and working full tilt. That's the only way you will be able to make these electrics affordable to all consumers, unless your plan is to only stay in the high end market. Please don't do that, I would like to purchase an affordable electric car in my lifetime, and I would like it to be North American made. Don't disappoint me guys!
Reply to this comment
by CorwinB November 21, 2009 1:40 PM PST
They are actually using the money to make that car you want but they're gonna make it in France just to **** you off.
by jonathan0766 November 20, 2009 11:44 PM PST
The auto industry desperately needs to move to a built to order model to wipe out inventory and dealerships (reducing cost of vehicles by probably 30% in the process, while improving margins radically by killing the inventory problem). Go to a sales location, test drive / look at / touch models on hand, order your car, come back in a week and pick it up at the same location. It would triple auto industry profit margins, wipe out the massive inventory control problems (savings on not building tons of copies of cars that aren't selling well alone would justify it).

The unions and dealerships will never allow it of course. The business model I describe is almost literally illegal / outlawed due to vicious dealership cartel laws.
Reply to this comment
by SteveChicago November 22, 2009 8:51 AM PST
That would be nice. I hope the Tesla California plant is a non-union shop.
by krosafcheg November 21, 2009 8:17 AM PST
Problem is, most people that can't afford a nice, clean green car now. So all the people polluting now with junkers are not able to be within reach of affording "green cars", thus leaving this market to people probably already, or near "green", with the $.

$15-20k green car, with subsidy would do it.

This isn't rocket science folks.
Reply to this comment
by CorwinB November 21, 2009 1:42 PM PST
Just be patient. the prices will drop as soon as more companies start producing electric cars for the masses. Competition will lower the prices.
by Hernys November 21, 2009 7:07 PM PST
You can have that today, actually, but with a range of about 30 miles and no backup power. That should suffice for most people's commuting needs, but since they would need a backup car to cover their weekend needs it doesn't seem useful as a single car.
by sparrowhyperion November 21, 2009 8:43 AM PST
$49K... Yeh, Right... I have that right here... Somewhere... Oh well... Nevermind. When will the auto industry get the hint. These cars are way way too expensive for 99% of the population. For $49K I could buy a top of the line minivan with every option in the book. Or a fixer upper house for crying out loud. These cars will never make any impact as long as they are priced completely out of reach for the general public... They are still small, with limited range, and that won't change anytime soon if Opec and the big petro companies have anything to say about it.. Legally or illegally... Ever wonder why it has taken this long to come up with a working hybrid or all electric...? Whatever happened to the Wankel rotary engine which was three times more efficient as a standard inline engine, and for less cost? How about those guys in Australia that developed the practical and usable 2 cycle engine that would use less than half the gas...? Bought out and shut down I am guessing. The oil industry is going to squeeze every last dime out of oil and gas. Then THEY will come up with some new breakthrough technology and save the day. Just watch..

And remember. Just because you are paranoid; it doesn't mean that they AREN'T out to get you...
Reply to this comment
by Hernys November 21, 2009 7:11 PM PST
When are customers going to get a hint.
You can't make up the rules of physics. If you are so smart why don't you design a battery that yields a million miles and costs a dollar?
Some of the best brains in the planet are workign on the problem you complain about. But just because they are not there yet doesn't mean they don't "get it". It means it is just not possible now. If the battery pack alone costs $20K, would you rather build a car that's utter cr*p and costs $25K, or build one that's awesome and costs $49K?
By the way, the Model S is not small, it seats seven, has a 250 miles range and performs like a Porsche, so I don't know where you are getting your data that this isn't going to change if it has changed already.
For $49K you could buy a top of the line minivan, yes. And it would have half the acceleration, one fourth of the efficiency, one tenth of the design and 0% of the environmental friendliness of this car. So your point is?
by adfrex November 22, 2009 12:12 PM PST
You need to remember that the largest single cost in such cars is not something the Auto Manufacturers can currently influence. The Battery Pack is the single most costly component. Lets hope the prices fall there then the cars will become cheaper
Reply to this comment
by cleanthinking November 23, 2009 9:45 AM PST
I thin, prizes of the batteries will fall in 2010 rapidly. Especially the german Cleantech firm Li-Tec will help, getting electric vehicles into the market.

Best regards,
Martin from <a href="http://www.globalcleantech.com">Globalcleantech.com</a>
Reply to this comment
by knowles2 November 23, 2009 3:45 PM PST
I would not buy any shares in this company until the rumours coming out China, of cars which equal Tesla performance an will be made cheaper out there due to lower labour costs.

If it true, then Tesla is going to be uncompetitive by manufacturing there cars in California, which I am sure not the cheapest place to higher people.

Overall I think this company serve better by staying in private hands an licensing it technology to the establishing players an building it own high end electric cars as a means to develop more patents to license.
Because so far it seemed to of been out maneuver by foreign companies an laden with debt. Certainly not a company I will be investing in any time soon.
Reply to this comment
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
advertisement

Most Popular

  1. Microsoft: Blu-ray costs holding PS3 back
  2. Why Google's Nexus One hasn't flopped (yet)
  3. Report: Google to leave China on April 10
  4. Beware the new Facebook password reset scam
  5. A visual tour of IE9 preview (screenshots)
See full River page
advertisement

Viacom, Google air dirty laundry in court docs

Copyright confrontation gets fierce. Viacom says YouTube founders always intended to build video version of Napster and looked for ways to "to avoid the copyright bastards."
• Google's statement on YouTube-Viacom

Google's fast pipe to Asia almost ready

An undersea cable built by a group including Google and telecom companies is set to start carrying traffic at any point, with Google to get as much as 20 percent of the capacity.

About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech reporter Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Subscribe to this feed Subscribe via RSS

Click this link to view as XML.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right