• On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.
November 4, 2009 9:31 AM PST

Microsoft cuts 800 more jobs

by Ina Fried
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 72 comments

Microsoft said on Wednesday that it is notifying approximately 800 workers that their jobs are being eliminated as the software giant completes the layoffs it announced earlier this year.

In January, Microsoft said it would cut approximately 5,000 positions before the end of the next fiscal year, which ends in June. With the latest cuts, Microsoft said it has essentially completed those layoffs. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in May that it was mostly, but not entirely, done with the job eliminations.

Actually, though, the latest cuts will push Microsoft past that 5,000 number. Once these cuts are made, it will have eliminated approximately 5,800 jobs since January, said Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos.

Wednesday's job cuts were spread across multiple businesses and around the globe, Gellos said. Microsoft didn't announce any specific products that are getting the axe as a a result of Wednesday's cuts, although it has cut a variety of products in recent months, including Microsoft Money, Windows Live OneCare and, just this past week, its small business accounting product line.

There could also be additional cuts, even as Microsoft does some hiring in key areas. Although January's layoffs were the company's first across-the-board cuts, it regularly reviews its businesses and makes adjustments as necessary, Gellos said.

"We'll manage our businesses closely and do the things that we need to do," Gellos said.

Update 12:05 p.m. PT: As noted by TechCrunch and others, among those let go on Wednesday was Don Dodge--one of Microsoft's key voices in Silicon Valley and a director on the company's emerging business team. Dodge wrote about the turn of events on his personal blog Wednesday.

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.
Recent posts from Beyond Binary
Windows 8 in 2012?
Sinofsky's Windows plan: More data, less testosterone
Ballmer: Windows 7 selling like hotcakes
Windows boss on building his first laptop
Livescribe pen gets an app store
Office 2010 beta goes public
Windows Azure containers on display in LA
PDC Day 2 live blog: Office 2010, IE 9 on stage
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (72 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by solitare_pax November 4, 2009 10:17 AM PST
Perhaps Windows 7 has increased their productivity to the point where they don't need the extra help any longer.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:40 PM PST
A lot of the positions were for jobs created for the Win7 project. Now that is done, they are no longer needed. Contract workers.
by Gold_Storm_Mac November 4, 2009 1:25 PM PST
@Vega
probably contract workers from apple :)
by JoeF2 November 4, 2009 2:50 PM PST
@vega:
Contract workers are not laid off. Their contracts are canceled. A whole different thing. Layoff means that these were employees.
by DrtyDogg November 4, 2009 3:03 PM PST
@Joe: I didn't see where they specified that all of these job "cuts" where full time salary employees, do you have a link for that to go with your definition?
by JoeF2 November 4, 2009 4:26 PM PST
@DirtyDogg:

Care to explain how exactly you lay off contractors?
You can only lay off employees. They can cancel the contracts they have with outside companies who provide contract employees, including self-employed people, but that has nothing to do with layoffs.
In particular, contractors don't get severance pay, and are not subject to layoff protections, etc.
Anybody who has worked as employee and as contractor knows these things, btw.
by DrtyDogg November 5, 2009 4:42 AM PST
you answered your own question. Though you keep using the term layoff while everybody else is using the term job cuts. I don't know what kind of jobs where cut which is why I asked for your source showing that they where all full time employees. Instead you go on a tangent about the "correct" terminology in daeling with contract workers. Even in that tangent the terminology you where defending isn't the terminology used, except by you. With out any better sources I would place my money on Vegaman_Dan's comment being reasonably accurate, with his previous claims of being or have been a contract worker for Microsoft he is at least somewhat reliable with information coming from the Microsoft campu.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 10:24 AM PST
"Actually, though, the latest cuts will push Microsoft past that 5,000 number. Once these cuts are made, it will have eliminated approximately 5,800 jobs since January, said Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos. "

So Microsoft laid off nearly 6,000 people then.

(I know I'm gonna burn in hell for this, but I gotta ask): I wonder if the new layoff victims will have to give back their severance checks too...
Reply to this comment
by JustinBeaird November 4, 2009 11:18 AM PST
i wonder if we now have 6,000 new linux or mac users :)
by kojacked November 4, 2009 12:17 PM PST
"I know I'm gonna burn in hell for this, but I gotta ask" and there you go; a "tool" in action.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:45 PM PST
Contract workers brought on to finish up on the Win7 project. Now that project is over, the positions are no longer needed.

Really, I'm surprised people have difficulties with this concept.

Some FTE's were also released from what I see, but only 200 from the more than 35,000 on campus. Meanwhile, MSFT is actively hiring currrently for other projects so... yeah.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 12:54 PM PST
@ Justin: an even better question - how many of them will be boning up on Linux as a new career: http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid39_gci1373285,00.html

@kojacked: Is name-calling all that you have left, or can I get some strawmen arguments and faux claims of credibility out of you today as well?
by cbscowards November 4, 2009 6:26 PM PST
@vegaman_dan

I think the concept is difficult because most companies don't announce the ending of contracts. Contract positions are by definition temporary. So when they end, most companies and people would not call that a job cut. If I hire a contractor to build an addition onto my house, nobody would say that I eliminated his job when he finishes the contract and leaves.

So, what's your source that the number includes contractors?
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 9:12 PM PST
@cbscowards

My source is Microsoft. I'm not employed by Microsoft, but have internal access and get the announcements that hte media then use for their articles. What the media uses or doesn't use is up to them.
by kojacked November 4, 2009 9:37 PM PST
"Is name-calling all that you have left, or can I get some strawmen arguments and faux claims of credibility out of you today as well?" I think you've got that more than covered so no need to add more FUD and strawman arguments to this forum as you do day in and day out. I don't need to live in a fantacy land as you do.
by baconstang November 4, 2009 10:37 AM PST
And how many has Apple laid off this year?
Reply to this comment
by ducttape36 November 4, 2009 10:50 AM PST
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10226486-37.html

1600 in the retail arm as of last april, dont think they have done anyhting else since then. that makes for about a 5 percent cut of their employee workforce.

microsoft cuts account for about 6 percent of their workforce.

everyone's hurting.
by sciontcya November 4, 2009 10:51 AM PST
I think none. But I thought I recalled a story where some small group was let go???
by David Dudley November 4, 2009 11:06 AM PST
Apple lays off people all the time, they just do it in small numbers and don't announce it.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:46 PM PST
@baconstang:

Why does it matter? Apple and Microsoft are not the same company. The only purpose in your comment I can see is to cause trouble.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 9:24 PM PST
@lesbihonest17

Whoa, a bit of an over reaction? Not to mention a violation of the CNET Terms of Service here.
by atriusNY November 4, 2009 10:37 AM PST
Perhaps you will die to your ignorance.

Last time, some people were paid less than they were supposed to, and some were paid more than they should have been.

Microsoft made extra payment to those who received less, but to those who received more they said they could keep the difference.
Reply to this comment
by atriusNY November 4, 2009 10:38 AM PST
die = due
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 11:19 AM PST
Psst! I know the drill on how it happened... and Microsoft ate a huge excrement sandwich over it.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:48 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

And to be fair, you should also say that the issue was resolved completely, with many people actually keeping the extra money they were paid by mistake.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 12:55 PM PST
PS: I just parsed the typoed sentence... sounds like a cool line out of an old B-grade SciFi movie

Mad Scientist: "You fool! you will die to your ignorance!"
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 1:13 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

Yeah, that was a pretty good typo indeed. I liked it.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 1:34 PM PST
"you should also say that the issue was resolved completely"

...why should I? It took a public outcry and a shedload of bad PR for the company to do the right thing. It shouldn't take such measures for the right thing to happen, Dan.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 9:27 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

I see- so when a company has an issue, you cry out long and loud about their failures, but when they acknowledge the issue, address it to the satisfaction of all those involved, then you'll conveniently ignore that?

Uh huh. So you only really care if it means you can complain about it. That makes a lot more sense now.
by stocklirider November 4, 2009 10:48 AM PST
I think companies should start getting taxed for every employee they layoff. This whole 'layoff' thing is a self-fulfilling prophesy, which undermines the rest of the economy. it doesn't help anyone... not even the company, as noone with half a brain would want to work for a company that just lays people off every 4 years.

Economic stability is what we need in this country. Stop laying everyone off and more people will have money to keep this economy going. Why can't people see this??? Instead we're dead set on creating this goliath of a health care system thats going to send this economy into the toilet. We should be saving this money and incentivising businesses to hire more people, while taxing those who lay off. Use the revenue generated to both give incentives to companies to hire more people, and offer emergency loans to companies who keep employees and coast through the bad economic times.

I am a genius i know. When will people start to wake up and realize how much we're being played.
Reply to this comment
by B-Ri November 4, 2009 11:19 AM PST
So your solution is to increase the costs to companies that feel they can't afford their current workforce? Wouldn't that increased cost then cause them to have to shrink even further? Just saying...Nice the way you got the jab at health care reform in there, totally off topic.
by Chao_Sama November 4, 2009 12:04 PM PST
No your not an genius. Your an idiot.

Peace
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:48 PM PST
They are taxed currently on their headcount. Reduction in headcount reduces those taxes.
by the_mrwhite November 4, 2009 10:50 AM PST
LOLz at MS, you make crap and people aren't buying as much of your crap any more. Can't wait for the Google cloud office suit to take off more and more, then people will stop buying MS Office completely driving MS sales lower and less licenses will be sold thus driving MS out of another market. SO can't wait.
Reply to this comment
by csturdivant November 4, 2009 11:17 AM PST
**yawn** You are an idiot. This is nothing to do with their products, but their bloated staffs.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:49 PM PST
You might want to take a few minutes to read the article before you post. Your comments might have been a bit different had you done that.
by AllBrown November 4, 2009 12:56 PM PST
I agree if MS made anything worth a dollar maybe I would walk into one of there knockoff stores. Really people are you trying to support MS because you work for them? What is the deal they make tons of crap that you can get somewhere else for free.

MS jacks up the whole market making crap. Point IE cost millions in development costs to make things work with there pile of crap browser. Faster they go the better
by csturdivant November 5, 2009 5:32 AM PST
AllBrown you are a tool also. These layoffs have NOTHING to do with their products. It was a result of bloated staffs that increased in size over the years. ALL companies are going though this as just about all companies expanded their staffs as well. Tell me that you do not know anybody affected by layoffs over the past year or so, and if they were, did their company "make crap" also?
by sciontcya November 4, 2009 10:51 AM PST
Final Cut?
No, not Apple software, just another nail in the bloated coffin.
Too bad for the workers though - that sucks - especially before the holidays.
Can't a company like MS afford to keep these folks until next spring?
I mean, they're so successful and have 10s of billions of dollars?
If this were Apple, you asspods would be all over this...but it's not.
Reply to this comment
by the_mrwhite November 4, 2009 10:56 AM PST
The thing is MS loses money in almost every devision they have except the OS and Office devision, becuase they license the crap out of it to companies, that's how they make their money. They don't a dime from pretty much everything else. Remove the office suit and they're pretty much doomed and they will go back to being a an OS only company again.
by ducttape36 November 4, 2009 11:05 AM PST
im pretty sure xbox is doing fine as well. but this is how tech companies work. google makes all their money from search advertising. all their other ventures hemmorage just as badly. youtube being a perfect example. have they turned a profit there yet at all? microsoft best at OSes and its Office suite, so of course thats where they get their money. just like google makes its money through serach ads. so i dont really know what your point is. that i you take away their top product that they are doomed? well, yeah... same for every company.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 11:20 AM PST
"im pretty sure xbox is doing fine as well."

The XBox eked out 150 or so million this past quarter. Not really enough to pay the bills, when you think about it.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:52 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

It more than paid the bills. And they are actively hiring more people for future releases.

You got to spend money to make money.

Someone reading your comments might get the wrong idea that you hate everything and anything about Microsoft. Something to consider when posting.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 1:33 PM PST
"You got to spend money to make money. "

So spending several billion (or more) on a product (the xbox 360) for 6+ years, and finally getting to a $150m/yr profit when it's about to expire its lifecycle is "making money"?

Not seeing the upside here, Dan.
by DrtyDogg November 4, 2009 3:15 PM PST
@Random_Walk: As you know the XBOX division has been profitable for a year now, and the 150Mil is for a Q not a year. Keep on trolling
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 9:44 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

You're intentionally trying to be dumb and ignorant here to make a point that was pretty weak to begin with. Nobody is buying it though.

It's a good attempt at spin, but again, it just isn't working anymore. Reality trumps fiction.
by Dust_Puppy November 4, 2009 11:01 AM PST
This is making all the news, but let's face it, we're fortunate these numbers don't have extra zeros behind them in this economy.

??? I'm confused by commenters on both sides . . . to quote my 3-year-old: NOT NICE.

Grow up people.
Reply to this comment
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 11:21 AM PST
"...but let's face it, we're fortunate these numbers don't have extra zeros behind them in this economy."

Maybe, maybe not. A lot of corporations (Intel, IBM, Apple, etc) are actually rebounding right now, and are beginning to re-hire.
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:54 PM PST
@Random_Walk:

"Maybe, maybe not. A lot of corporations (Intel, IBM, Apple, etc) are actually rebounding right now, and are beginning to re-hire. "

Microsoft is one of those. Unfortunately a person who is involved in doing marketing or research into developing markets for Win7 releases isn't exactly the person to also be an experienced game developer. Some jobs are lost, others are gained. Right now Microsoft is actively hiring people and expanding their campus.

Nice try at the doom and gloom, but the payroll says otherwise.

These layoffs were the end of them with no new reductions planned, but an expansion happening instead.
by Norseman November 4, 2009 11:01 AM PST
Until Ballmer goes, the job isn't done properly.
Reply to this comment
by the_mrwhite November 4, 2009 11:08 AM PST
AGREED!
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:55 PM PST
Would you like to apply for the position? What are your qualifications? Let's see that resume. :)

First off, can you say the word "Developers" repeatedly? I understand that's a prerequesite.
by Ted Miller November 4, 2009 11:18 AM PST
Had to pay for that butterfly makeover somehow.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:56 PM PST
I never understood why a company has to keep redesigning logos and branding to keep it fresh. Fast food places, auto brand names, etc. You get used to one thing and it changes which makes it more confusing.
by HernandezUSA November 4, 2009 11:43 AM PST
Was that 800 Americans laid off?

Or

800 "VISA" holders?

I would expect US workers to keep thier jobs and let the Visa holders go home...
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 November 4, 2009 11:46 AM PST
Wow. Talk about inappropriate.
by tketcher November 4, 2009 11:51 AM PST
You would be wroing, They are not interested in American Jobs, American Talent, American Inovation. They are interested in Cheap.
by Random_Walk November 4, 2009 12:57 PM PST
Nothing noted about how many were H1-B holders, though contractually they get to stay at least until the end of said contract (else Microsoft has to pay out quite a wad of cash to break the contract, so... I'm guessing the locals got it in the neck first).
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:57 PM PST
800 Microsoft based employees and contractors. 200 in Redmond, the others scattered across the world.
by ByTheBook November 4, 2009 10:08 PM PST
Better judgment tells me to ignore these kinds of threads, but I just can't stand to listen anymore.

Cuts are typically at the project level - as in "we don't need to do <this> anymore". No attention is paid to nationality of the employee.

Concerning pay scale - working at Microsoft myself and having had many people report to me over the years - the people from other countries who come to MS enter at the same level as people from United States and are subject to the same pay scale under the same job expectations. I know because I do their reviews and know what these people are being paid. Pay scales at MS are based on competitive labor rates in regional markets - so Washington state, for example, pays differently than Texas or North Carolina, or Canada or Ireland or Japan. That labor rate is applied the same way to all FTE in a region regardless what country they came from.

I know making up ideas about MS undercutting pay by hiring from the outside is fun to do, but you don't have the facts right.
by AluminumMonster November 4, 2009 11:53 AM PST
I swear ive seen so many proverbial nails in MS's coffin, that you could build the empire state building with tall those nails. Stop being delusional MS will be fine, and continue to make you lose sleep every night for the forseeable future.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 12:58 PM PST
No, the sky is falling, really. Just read the comments. Get your umbrella out just in case.

By the way, I hear a bridge in New Jersey is for sale...
by ByTheBook November 5, 2009 7:30 AM PST
You really aren't paying attention to the facts.

Microsoft goes back and forth between having the biggest v.s. second biggest market cap of any company in the world. The fluctuation is based on the price of oil - I believe it is Exxon/Mobil that keep trading place with MS on this front.

Microsoft was almost the only company to sustain a profit during the internet bubble burst of 2000. Not only did it turn a profit - its profits grew.

Microsoft's profits have grown every year since it existed with the exception of this last year - that exception being driven by a down economy where across the board customers were buying fewer computers in general. Despite that hit in growth, MS still made a massive profit.

Are there challenges out there for Microsoft? Of course. Is the competitive landscape for Microsoft more difficult and challenging than it has ever been? Yes. Microsoft's competitors are smarter, faster and more able to execute than they have ever been in the past. This in no way is a nail in the coffin for Microsoft. The money keeps rolling in from all the sectors that matter to its business and shows no sign that it is going to stop coming. If anything, the market should be relieved the competition is heating up for Microsoft because it forces Microsoft to make better product.
by resident123 November 4, 2009 12:06 PM PST
"The XBox eked out 150 or so million this past quarter. Not really enough to pay the bills, when you think about it.

Finance 101 - $150M or so profit (after the bills have been paid). Prorate that for the year and you are looking at $600M profit. In this economy most businesses would love to see that kind of profit.
Reply to this comment
by bobdjojo November 4, 2009 12:53 PM PST
Yup tketcher is correct. Americans are the only source of talent and innovation. Everyone one else only has cheap labor to offer. It makes perfect sense for the human race to have all of its' talent and innovation conveniently placed in one geographic region.
Reply to this comment
by JoeF2 November 4, 2009 3:00 PM PST
Yeah, who cares about that strange Finnish guy who came up with Linux... (and came to the US on an H1 visa.)
Wasn't Microsoft calling Linux "Un-American" at some point?
by slumbergod November 4, 2009 5:48 PM PST
How to keep your lazy, greedy investors happy...just sack as many staff as you can to make sure profits come first.
Reply to this comment
by cbscowards November 4, 2009 6:11 PM PST
If people stopped violating license agreements and instead paid for all the copies of Windows they install, things like this wouldn't happen. You know who you are. Right ASL?
Reply to this comment
by AlienXT November 4, 2009 6:59 PM PST
Were any contracters or vendors let go today?

- <a href="http://edgetechs.blogspot.com/">EdgeTech </a>
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 4, 2009 9:49 PM PST
Contractors, yes. Vendors, no. Vendors are not part of this at all. Vendors have contracts with Microsoft instead that would have to be dealt with and are not subject to changes like this except at the time of contract renewal as I understand it.

For example, MSDINING is set by a headcount number. Their contract saiys they will prepare meals for X number of employees. if that number changes, then the contract would have to be changed and that's not an easy or quick process as these contracts are set for 3-5 years in length between renewals
by rushin2U November 5, 2009 9:24 AM PST
These are FTEs who are let go. If you work on the campus you can see clearly - these are FTEs, not a- or v- that are being let go.

If these "cuts" are part of the initial plans of MS' executives for 2009 than these cuts are FTEs, as it was announced at the beginning of the year.

Enough of this - apples or oranges... They are all fruits!!!

What makes me chuckle is the hype of how much MS is hiring now days. It's not true. Good luck applying for their "careers." It's "who you know" - that is how it works at MS. Forget OFCCP regulations...
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight November 5, 2009 2:09 PM PST
A good company who really is hiring would make a huge effort to turn some of the ones being laid off back into the hiring pool so they never had to be laid off to begin with. Especially when the lay off is an arbitrary number across the board.
Reply to this comment
(72 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

The 411 on early-termination fees

Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?

Google has its own plan for Netbooks

No, the search giant isn't saying it will build a Netbook. But it sure knows what it would like one running Chrome OS to resemble, and that's a little different from the Netbook of today.
• Screenshot tour of Chrome OS

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.

Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement

    Inside CNET News

    Scroll Left Scroll Right