THE HILL

Healthcare encore

By A.B. Stoddard - 02/24/10 07:50 PM ET

Say what you will about President Obama, but the guy sure knows how to put on a show. He did it at the Jefferson/Jackson dinner in Des Moines, Iowa, in November of 2007 when he was more than 20 points behind Hillary Clinton, and the momentum of his performance that night rocketed him to a surprise victory in the Iowa caucuses. He did it again months later in a televised speech on the state of race in America, when his relationship with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright was threatening his primary campaign against Clinton. Last month, just 10 days after Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) won the seat to replace the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D) in an historic upset, the president startled the buoyant GOP and even the bewildered, apoplectic members of his party with a flawless performance at a retreat of House Republicans in Baltimore.

Grand shows have helped Obama out of many a corner, and are likely to rescue him again. The display at Blair House on Thursday — a televised, bipartisan summit designed to revive the demolished debate on healthcare reform — may not be one of those times. But having lost a year of time, tremendous political capital, three elections, the energy of the party’s grass roots and the support of the American people, this show wasn’t an option for Obama; it was a necessity.

The summit won’t accomplish any legislative work. Even with the name cards and water glasses, it won’t come close to a hearing or a markup. Most importantly, beyond some conciliatory words, nothing bipartisan can happen whatsoever. The Democrats are scrambling behind closed doors to assemble a partisan bill they can jam through once and for all. Republicans are coming to the meeting with one unshakable goal in mind: Stop reform at all costs.

Since the summit was announced, Republicans have demanded nothing short of “starting over,” which sounds good but is obviously a non-starter. The provisions in the bills are all well-known, the disagreements on healthcare both between and within the parties are well-established, and with the public intently focused on the economy, the Democrats would probably be better off just handing House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) the Speaker’s gavel than wasting time beginning anew on healthcare reform. Republicans decided before the summit they would not accept any compromise bones Obama wanted to delight the television audience with by throwing their way. Purchasing insurance across state lines? Limits on medical malpractice awards? Softening the mandate? Health savings accounts? Republicans say there is no frosting that can make them eat this cake.

Democrats, desperately divided and trying to hide it on television, are hoping a masterful exhibition of cooperation and compromise on Obama’s part, combined with a spectacle of grumpy GOP obstinacy, will give them the political cover so they can pass a partisan bill. Of course, they tried this last year and it didn’t work, or at least not in time to sign a reform bill into law before the Democratic sky fell with the loss of Kennedy’s seat. Between their divisions over abortion and the public’s rejection of the bill that plagues dozens of moderate and conservative Democrats running for reelection, it is hard to see how Democrats pass healthcare reform.

President Obama knows that failure will be devastating. He needs reform to pass. But if the pageantry at Blair House is the final curtain call for reform, Obama was smart to star in one last show, bringing both sides together on healthcare, if only in one room on one day. Then he won’t be on the premises when it goes back to Congress to die.

Stoddard is an associate editor of The Hill.

Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/ab-stoddard/83525-healthcare-encore

Comments (61)

You Republicans with your guns and religious stupidity. All you care about is your money and God. We want healthcare for free now! It is a natural right that we are all born to. i say chain the doctors and nurses to the hospitals and FORCE them to give us our healthcare! Seize the drug companies and put them out of business! We the people want government control of everything in our lives!BY ETHAN on 02/24/2010 at 20:57
It is because of the likes of "Ethan" that I will never support a Health Care Bill that would even come close to covering the "Ethan's" of America. Ethan with such a desire as to have" Big Brother" take care of your miserable life, do us all a favor and move to a more accommodating country, oh and please take any of your like minded friends with you. Signed, a damn proud Republican.BY Brian on 02/24/2010 at 22:51
BRIAN, don't waste your breath.At least ETHAN is being honest. I would imagine Obama's 'ideal' America is much closer to ETHAN'S than yours. I would also imagine that you have made the most of your 'liberty' and therefore have a healthy respect for it. ETHAN, on the other hand is willing to trade no less than his freedom (and ours) for security he is unable to provide for himself. That deserves pitty, not scorn.BY azjim on 02/25/2010 at 00:40
…as for the substance of A.B.'s article, A.B. how can you give this guy credit for "bringing both sides together" are you hoping that the mere 'utterance' of the words in the final paragraph, will somehow make it so, like some, subliminal 'afterimage'? This president has 'zero' desire to work across the aisle and his actions prove it.BY azjim on 02/25/2010 at 01:04
I love how these supposedly "conservative Republicans" whine with their Orwellian tones (sometimes explicitly—Matt Drudge invokes "big brother" constantly) to spike social welfare reforms. They didn't bat an eye when Bush pushed through all kinds of terror-fighting Constitution-trampling. Even the Obama administration engages in these policies. Clinton was for rendition. Obama will let the govt. kill you if they suspect you're a terrorist (according to the press). If you conservatives were serious about the threat Obama poses to the nation then you would NEVER allow him the powers Bush and the "conservatives" giftwrapped for him in the years preceding his election. Of course, Obama doesn't pose such a threat. Republicans are just hysterical. It comes down to a fundamental question: if the government is so incompetent, then why do you trust them to invade other countries and manage them successfully in some sort of archaic colonial revival? A Republican today could be imagined to forcefully advocate for government management of the entire world but it shouldn't be allowed to intervene when the financial sector totally collapses because it doesn't know what it's doing and might lose money. Why don't they see any overlap in the two scenarios? The only difference between the two scenarios is that the financial collapse was instigated by Republican (and neoliberal) policies in the first place. The bailout was essential by the time of the crash. On the other hand, Iraq was an unnecessary distraction which ultimately has paid NO dividends because it is under the thumb of the extremist Iranian theocracy. Amazingly, conservatives are willing to spend a trillion dollars on absolutely superfluous Iraqi development and warmaking but unwilling to bail out the American economy when their own policies turn Wall Street into a cesspool of gambling.BY jim on 02/25/2010 at 03:08
12 (plus) years of free public education, and still so many really stupid people in the country. What's the point?BY Bern on 02/25/2010 at 08:23
AB as usual you write on a level far superior to anyone else here at The Hill. You have been calling this situation correctly all along. I wish The Hill had more folks like you writing opinion columns. Too many of the other columnists write at such a juvenile level, it is making me lose interest in this fine publication. Last year in the summer, you saw what so many others failed to see. You saw where this thing was going. As for all the partisan and negative comments here, AB's columns simply don't deserve to have them. Budowsky and Moulitsas should attract that kind of trolling but not AB. I remain ABFan!BY ABFan on 02/25/2010 at 08:28
I'm not so pessimistic.If the reconciliation bill deals with the abortion issue, the pro-lifers will vote for it. Pro-choicers can vote for restrictions on abortion funding; pro-lifers cannot vote for a bill that pays for abortion, period.If Obama puts on a good show things could happen fast.BY RussS on 02/25/2010 at 08:30
this is just a dog and pony show. the president is not willing to compromise and the republicans aren't willing to sign on to a flawed bill.televised, hope and change, huh? what about the late night meetings in the wh or congressional buildings.poor excise for a leader.BY ktr on 02/25/2010 at 08:32
AB is partially right. Obama knew how to put on a good show when the American people's good graces were with him. We now know he's a slimy Chicago pol beholden only to unions , trial lawyers , and big banks. The substance of Health care legislation is as flawed as the process it took to create it and this meeting today will be judged for what it is …a last gasp to prop up Obama's image at expense of Republicans. If Democrats do manage to pass it, an electoral disaster is coming at them in NovemberBY riker on 02/25/2010 at 08:37

Add Comment

Name (required)

This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.

Your Comments

This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.

This is not phishing, this is art!
Read more here what this is about.